AI visibility, without the hand-wavy score
Know whether your site is ready to be surfaced by AI answers
Run a fast audit on any public domain to see how well its structure, trust signals, and extractable content support AI search visibility.
The current audit reviews llms.txt, crawlability, sitemap coverage, structured data, homepage clarity, and trust signals.
A mid-range score like this usually means a site is technically reachable, but still leaves AI systems guessing about what matters most and what to cite.
AiVis focuses on practical readiness checks that can lead to a better content structure, stronger trust signals, and clearer site communication.
- Where AI systems may struggle to identify your brand or offer
- Which technical signals are missing or too thin to trust
- How much of the homepage can be cleanly extracted and reused
- What to fix first if you want a site that is easier to cite
Who this is for
A better first step than guessing why AI answers ignore your site
AiVis is most useful when a team wants a concrete, explainable first audit before committing to ongoing monitoring or heavier consulting work.
SaaS and product marketing teams
Spot weak summaries, missing entity cues, and thin trust sections before asking why your brand is absent from AI answers.
Content sites and editorial teams
See whether the site structure makes it easy for answer engines to extract key statements, FAQs, and attribution-ready context.
Agencies and consultants
Use AiVis as a clean first-pass audit you can walk clients through before pitching ongoing monitoring or deeper delivery.
What happens
A lightweight workflow that still feels like a real product
We normalize the domain, fetch the homepage and discovery files, and detect the strongest signals available from a first crawl.
You get a readiness score, highlighted issues, detailed checks, and clear recommendations instead of vague AI-language promises.
If the report matters, you can send it to a team inbox, request a deeper pass, or use it as the starting point for recurring monitoring.
Coverage
What the current audit checks
The first release is intentionally narrow enough to be explainable, but broad enough to surface the main reasons a site may be hard for AI systems to trust or summarize.
llms.txt, robots.txt, sitemap.xml, canonical behavior, and whether the site presents a coherent first crawl path.
Organization, Product, Article, FAQPage, and other schema types that help clarify what the site is, who it is for, and what can be cited.
Homepage summary strength, headings, FAQ presence, and whether the page offers clean blocks that AI systems can reuse without guesswork.
About, Contact, and support pathways that make the brand feel legitimate and easier to identify as a stable entity.
Why teams use it
You should leave with a better next move, not a mysterious score
A first audit should reduce uncertainty. It should tell a team what is missing, why it matters, and what deserves attention first.
- A score that is framed as readiness, not fake platform ranking data
- Checks that map to real page or configuration changes
- Language that works for both operators and less technical stakeholders
- A first product touchpoint that can grow into recurring monitoring later
FAQ
Questions teams usually ask before trying an audit
No. AiVis currently measures readiness and visibility signals, not live ranking positions inside ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Google AI answers.
You get a real report for that domain with a readiness score, issue highlights, detailed checks, and prioritized fixes. If the site matters, you can then send the report to your inbox and continue from there.
Yes. The current version is especially useful for first-pass diagnostics, discovery calls, and identifying which accounts justify a deeper engagement.
You receive confirmation that the report was recorded, and the lead can be used to continue with a deeper review, recurring monitoring discussion, or batch audit conversation.
Teams that need multi-user accounts, automated monitoring jobs, or direct integrations will need the later commercial version rather than this first public audit experience.
Need a deeper pass?
Use the first audit as the beginning of a real conversation
If you want to review several domains, compare client accounts, or discuss what a recurring version should cover, contact us with the report context and the sites you care about.